CO129-077 - Sir Robinson - 1860 [1-6] — Page 307

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

" of them otherwise, he should have refused to comply; or at all events, before acquiescing in such an obviously improper proceeding as the removal of public monies from a public office to private keeping, he should have fortified himself with a written order, and have taken a receipt in proof of payment. He should then, as soon as possible, have brought the matter to the notice of the Government.

Mr Gunthorpe, however, omitted all these precautions, and the excuse he makes that Mr. Newman, when at the office, was in the habit of taking sole charge of this branch of business, is no justification; because when Mr. Newman ceased to attend the office, Mr. Gunthorpe received the money, and became accordingly the person accountable for its due application.

Mr Gunthorpe, therefore, is unquestionably officially responsible to the Government for the deficiency, even admitting the correctness of his own statements.

But there are several circumstances calculated to cast doubt upon Mr Gunthorpe's statement that he paid these sums to Mr Newman.

Firstly, the absence of proof of any kind, although the payments, if made at all, must have been made at five different times.

Secondly, the absence of anything amongst Mr. Newman's papers or

Edit History

2026-05-18 17:43:23 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
" of them otherwise, he should have refused to comply; or at all events, before acquiescing in such an obviously improper proceeding as the removal of public monies from a public office to private keeping, he should have fortified himself with a written order, and have taken a receipt in proof of payment. He should then, as soon as possible, have brought the matter to the notice of the Government. Mr Gunthorpe, however, omitted all these precautions, and the excuse he makes that Mr. Newman, when at the office, was in the habit of taking sole charge of this branch of business, is no justification; because when Mr. Newman ceased to attend the office, Mr. Gunthorpe received the money, and became accordingly the person accountable for its due application. Mr Gunthorpe, therefore, is unquestionably officially responsible to the Government for the deficiency, even admitting the correctness of his own statements. But there are several circumstances calculated to cast doubt upon Mr Gunthorpe's statement that he paid these sums to Mr Newman. Firstly, the absence of proof of any kind, although the payments, if made at all, must have been made at five different times. Secondly, the absence of anything amongst Mr. Newman's papers or
Baseline (Original)
8 " of them otherwise, he should have refused to comply; or at all events, before acquiesing in such an obviously improper proceeding as the removal of public Monies, s from a public office to private Keeping, he should have fortified himself with a written order, and have taken a -reccipt in proof of payment - He should then as soon as possible have brought the matter to the notice of the Government_ Mr Gunthorpe however omitted all these precautions. and the excense he makes that Mr. Newman when at the office was in the habit of taking sole charge of this branch business, is no justification; the- of because when Mr. Newman ceased to attend 4 297 the office Mr. Gunthorpe received the Money, and became accordingly the person accountable its due application. 5 for 2 Mr Gunthorpe, therefore, is unquelimably officially responsible to the Government for the deficiency even admitting the correctness of his own statements. But there are several circumstances calculated to cast doubt upon Mr Gunthorpe's statement that he said - these sums to Mr Newman. - pet. The absence of proof of any kind, although the payments if made at all must have been made at five different times. andly. The absence of any thing amongst Mr. Newman's papers or
2026-05-18 17:43:23 · Baseline
View content

8

" of them otherwise, he should have refused

to comply; or at all events, before acquiesing

in such an obviously improper proceeding

as the removal of public Monies,

s from a public office to private Keeping, he should have fortified himself with a

written order, and have taken a

-reccipt

in proof of payment - He should then

as soon as

possible have brought the

matter to the notice of the Government_

Mr Gunthorpe however omitted all

these precautions.

and

the

excense

he makes that Mr. Newman when

at the office

was in the habit of taking

sole charge of this branch

business, is no

justification;

the-

of

because

when Mr. Newman ceased to attend

4

297

the office Mr. Gunthorpe received the

Money, and became accordingly the

person

accountable

its due application.

5 for 2

Mr Gunthorpe, therefore, is unquelimably

officially responsible to the Government

for the deficiency

even admitting the

correctness of his own statements.

But there are several circumstances

calculated to cast doubt upon Mr Gunthorpe's statement that he said -

these sums to Mr Newman. -

pet. The absence of proof of any kind, although the payments if made at all must have been made at five different

times.

andly. The absence of any thing

amongst Mr. Newman's papers

or

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.